Ragan’s PRDaily – VIdeoCollector- Brian Solis

“Public relations expert Brian Solis discusses how to find your audience online and how to communicate directly with them.”

The algorithm that rules the web | Revolution magazine

From Revolution magazine: “The mystery of the rising rankings

Since the beginning of this year, increasing numbers of big brands are appearing in the top ten search results on competitive generic search queries. They are elbowing out of the way thousands of lesser sites in the process. No-one is quite sure why this has happened, but some suspect that changes to Google’s algorithm made in February dubbed the ‘Vince update’ (after the Google engineer that made them) are responsible. This has benefited big brands to the detriment of smaller players.”

The lifecycle of Newsmemes – broadstuff

Alan Patrick: “Note that the blogosphere feeds off the mainstream media, in the main – which begs the question of what happens if it kills its host….”

Can you speak consultant? Jim Ylisela – Ragan.com

3. Socialize. This is my personal favorite. I actually had a fellow consultant on a project look me in the eye with grave concern and pose this question:

“Have you socialized that idea?”

I was dumbstruck and quickly tried to recover. “Uh, do you mean, did I take it out for drinks and show it a good time?” I asked.

What a dunderhead. My fellow consultant merely wanted to know whether I had discussed the idea with our client.

Let that be a lesson to you. Treat the best ideas like sailors who just arrived in port for an extended shore leave.

You know what to do.

Twitter Generates $48 Million of Media Coverage in a Month – Advertising Age – Digital

Twitter received almost 3 billion impressions — 2.73 billion, to be exact — in the past month, a time period that doesn’t even include the frenzied weeks in April in which Oprah and Ellen weighed in on the micro-blogging service. TV contributed to 57% of the PR value, newspapers 37% and magazines 5%. Incidentally, Fox News bested CNN in terms of total PR value delivered by its Twitter mentions, although CNN dropped the name more often.

In reality, said VMS CEO Peter Wengryn, the number of impressions over the past 30 days could be as much as double that, considering the company doesn’t measure mentions in all the smaller newspapers around the country.

“This is huge. It’s very, very high,” said Gary Getto, VP-integrated media intelligence at VMS. “In fact, we looked at online coverage of Twitter vs. Google. Twitter is running significantly higher than Google and I didn’t think anything was more popular than Google.”

In contrast, the media value of the coverage given to Microsoft’s Bing was just $573,834, and the reach of its free media came in at just 63 million impressions.

Presumably these valuations are based on advertising equivalence – sigh.

Richard Edelman on NYT piece: Spinning The Web

When I came into this business 32 years ago, my worst nightmare was to be presented as an empty-headed flack touting products without understanding, paid to drink with reporters in order to generate hits in the press. There are thousands of PR practitioners who work in an ethical and intelligent manner. This article missed the opportunity to present public relations as a vital profession at a time when reader attention is dispersed among media and ideas bubble up from the bottom.

Richard Edelman’s 5 myths of the PR Profile, “a more nuanced form of ethnic profiling.” Comments to his post are worth reading too.

Spinning the Web – PR in Silicon Valley: New York Times

“Gone are the days when snaring attention for start-ups in the Valley meant mentions in print and on television, or even spotlights on technology Web sites and blogs. Now P.R. gurus court influential voices on the social Web to endorse new companies, Web sites or gadgets — a transformation that analysts and practitioners say is likely to permanently change the role of P.R. in the business world, and particularly in Silicon Valley.” Claire Cain Miller, New York Times

Why do we search for “marketing” 135,000 times per day in the UK? And where have all the click throughs gone?

Marketing: searched for 135,000 times per day in the UK

Marketing: searched for 135,000 times per day in the UK

According to Google, we Brits enter the term marketing into our favourite search engine 134,466 times every day.  That translates to around 4.1 million times per month (curiously, by contrast, the term selling is searched for only 32,877 times per day – or just over 1 million times per month).

The accepted wisdom is that the number one organically ranked page on Google can expect to gain – on average – a potential 42pc of the total number of searches performed for a term. In the case of marketing in the UK, this should translate to a whopping 56,475 visits per day to the lucky page. And according to Google, the beneficiary should be the home page of Centaur Publishing’s Marketing Magazine – to the tune of around 1.75 million page views per month.

However, according to Google Ad Planner, the total number of page views to the Marketing Magazine site as a whole is currently only around 260,000 per month.

Clearly, there is a discrepancy somewhere.

Let us assume that Google’s search volume figures are correct. What are the possible explanations?

  1. For some bizarre reason, the vast majority of people who click on the term marketing don’t actually then click on any of the results they receive.
  2. The principal that the vast majority of click throughs from search occur on the first SERP (indeed, 42pc from the top ranked result) doesn’t hold in reality. Could it be that for certain terms, people stray far and beyond the first SERP?

Or it could be that Google Ad Planner’s figures tremendously underestimate the actual page views that Marketing Magazine is receiving?

Once again, in spite of all the data made available for free – and the ever growing list of general “rules” of internet marketing – the simple expedient of testing out data and theory together seems to throw up a host of contradictions.

Or perhaps I have missed a blindingly obvious explanation for all of the above – I’m more than willing to have my ignorance in this matter corrected. As, I’m sure, will most client side marketers who need to demonstrate the validity of their decisions.

Marketing Schizophrenia – Reinventing marketing – Blogs – Brand Republic

Good post from Alan Mitchell at Marketing magazine:

“To reinvent marketing successfully, I believe we have to jettison marketing’s Persuasion Paradigm: the belief that marketing is ‘effective’ when it changes consumers’ attitudes and behaviours, and that this is what good marketing does.

Persuasion isn’t marketing’s only paradigm. The other paradigm is alignment – the belief that successful companies and brands align themselves to doing what their customers want them to do.

With very few exceptions, these two belief systems are contradictory and mutually exclusive. If one is right, the other one can’t be. If you are doing more persuading, you are also doing less aligning. And vice versa.

But today, elements of both are alive and well in marketers’ minds, battling it out for supremacy. This constant warfare isn’t helpful.”

Freeconomics Part IV – Freemium, or if you ain’t paying you ain’t the customer – broadstuff

“If you ain’t paying for it, you ain’t the customer”. Excellent post from Alan Patrick (aka Broadstuff) on Chris Anderson’s Freemium model. Great writing:

“It was at this point that Mr Anderson revealed the Deus Ex Machina of this Freecosystem, the thing that actually keeps the wheels turning in this economic perpetual motion machine. “Thats for the Day Job”

The Day Job! Of course! Yes, the Day Job is what earns the Real Money. You then use your Free Time to make Free Stuff to sell on the Free World. But if your Day Job is making stuff that people that people are making for free, then what?”

%d bloggers like this: