<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An open source model for PR?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/</link>
	<description>Andrew Bruce Smith of escherman on technology PR. And George Orwell. Mostly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amazon.com and open source PR (more evidence for Most Frequent Contributor power) &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon.com and open source PR (more evidence for Most Frequent Contributor power) &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-808</guid>
		<description>[...] for Most Frequent Contributor&#160;power) According to Joe Brockmeier at ZDNet, Amazon is taking an open source approach to PR: The company has announced what it calls its “Holiday Customer Review Team.” These are six [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Most Frequent Contributor&nbsp;power) According to Joe Brockmeier at ZDNet, Amazon is taking an open source approach to PR: The company has announced what it calls its “Holiday Customer Review Team.” These are six [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More tips on supercharging your PR efforts with Twitter (a case study in open source PR) &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>More tips on supercharging your PR efforts with Twitter (a case study in open source PR) &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-753</guid>
		<description>[...] More tips on supercharging your PR efforts with Twitter (a case study in open source&#160;PR) Stephen Davies at PR Blogger is turning into a one man Twitter PR resource at the moment. And perhaps providing a useful case study in open source PR. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More tips on supercharging your PR efforts with Twitter (a case study in open source&nbsp;PR) Stephen Davies at PR Blogger is turning into a one man Twitter PR resource at the moment. And perhaps providing a useful case study in open source PR. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Roome</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Roome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll also pay a PR agency to help with my apostrophe Tourettes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll also pay a PR agency to help with my apostrophe Tourettes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Bruce Smith</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bruce Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben - thanks for the comment. I agree. I guess what I&#039;m getting  at is that many of the things that PR consultancies used to make money on (or at least charge a premium for) are now potentially free or can be had for little cost. It should mean focussing on genuine value add (including the things you mention). It should also mean not having to pay lots of money for real estate and other overheads that really add no value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben &#8211; thanks for the comment. I agree. I guess what I&#8217;m getting  at is that many of the things that PR consultancies used to make money on (or at least charge a premium for) are now potentially free or can be had for little cost. It should mean focussing on genuine value add (including the things you mention). It should also mean not having to pay lots of money for real estate and other overheads that really add no value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Roome</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Roome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-413</guid>
		<description>The exceptions PR should focus on are:

- decent writing and content creation 
- people genuinely knowledgeable and passionate about a specific industry (and specific areas within that industry) 
- real creativity

Clients will always pay for these. 

Particularly a combination of the first two with the far harder to find third. 

After all, why do creative ad agency&#039;s get hired? In theory, anyone can create a logo or copywrite. It&#039;s because amateurisation has it&#039;s limits. 

I forget who it was back in the late 90s  - once the web had taken off - wrote: &quot;It&#039;s been said that with an infinite amount of monkeys, typewriters and time, you&#039;ll eventually get the complete works of William Shakespeare. The world wide web has proved that wrong.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exceptions PR should focus on are:</p>
<p>- decent writing and content creation<br />
- people genuinely knowledgeable and passionate about a specific industry (and specific areas within that industry)<br />
- real creativity</p>
<p>Clients will always pay for these. </p>
<p>Particularly a combination of the first two with the far harder to find third. </p>
<p>After all, why do creative ad agency&#8217;s get hired? In theory, anyone can create a logo or copywrite. It&#8217;s because amateurisation has it&#8217;s limits. </p>
<p>I forget who it was back in the late 90s  &#8211; once the web had taken off &#8211; wrote: &#8220;It&#8217;s been said that with an infinite amount of monkeys, typewriters and time, you&#8217;ll eventually get the complete works of William Shakespeare. The world wide web has proved that wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annabel</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Annabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-405</guid>
		<description>@ Andrew &amp; Richard

I agree the big agencies are the ones that should be most worried. I think they will need to streamline  their team structures and change skills sets.  It will no longer enough to have people who are competent writers and good at media sell-ins. The global PR agencies will need account teams full of people who can not only write, but very new media savvy who have at the very least working knowledge and understanding of web design, photoshop editing, SEO, social networking, blogging, podcasting and most multi-media disciplines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andrew &amp; Richard</p>
<p>I agree the big agencies are the ones that should be most worried. I think they will need to streamline  their team structures and change skills sets.  It will no longer enough to have people who are competent writers and good at media sell-ins. The global PR agencies will need account teams full of people who can not only write, but very new media savvy who have at the very least working knowledge and understanding of web design, photoshop editing, SEO, social networking, blogging, podcasting and most multi-media disciplines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Bruce Smith</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bruce Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-404</guid>
		<description>@Annabel - agreed. I think that whole attitude will become more prevalent.

@Richard - yes, that is one of the paradoxes for the larger PR firm - how to continue justifying the fees paid when much (or most of it) is simply to pay for infrastructure costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Annabel &#8211; agreed. I think that whole attitude will become more prevalent.</p>
<p>@Richard &#8211; yes, that is one of the paradoxes for the larger PR firm &#8211; how to continue justifying the fees paid when much (or most of it) is simply to pay for infrastructure costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bailey</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I agree with Annabel. This is another example of what Clay Shirky describes as &#039;mass-amateurisation&#039;. Anyone can publish, anyone can produce news, anyone can do PR. To an extent.

So those paid to do PR have to add value (speed, competence, expertise). I&#039;d worry most about this trend if I were an international consultancy network needing high margins just to support the infrastructure. High margins for work that someone (ie one of my students) can attempt for free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Annabel. This is another example of what Clay Shirky describes as &#8216;mass-amateurisation&#8217;. Anyone can publish, anyone can produce news, anyone can do PR. To an extent.</p>
<p>So those paid to do PR have to add value (speed, competence, expertise). I&#8217;d worry most about this trend if I were an international consultancy network needing high margins just to support the infrastructure. High margins for work that someone (ie one of my students) can attempt for free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annabel</title>
		<link>http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/an-open-source-model-for-pr/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Annabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://escherman.wordpress.com/?p=404#comment-402</guid>
		<description>No far fetched at all. In fact I think it is already happening to a degree. 

For example I willingly (without being asked) offered a very big and famous PR agency my list of contacts in another area. I even offered to put them personally in touch with a couple of very good journalist contacts. I then helped them with sorting out some images for them.

Even though I&#039;m a small agency this is something I would not have dreamt of doing a few years ago as &#039;press lists&#039; were know as your secret weapon. 

So why would I help a big agency for no money (and  I wasn&#039;t angling for a job.)  The reason is because my mind set has changed and I now regard other PR people, not as competitors but as part of my community. I know one day I can pull on their knowledge pool for help (well hopefully.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No far fetched at all. In fact I think it is already happening to a degree. </p>
<p>For example I willingly (without being asked) offered a very big and famous PR agency my list of contacts in another area. I even offered to put them personally in touch with a couple of very good journalist contacts. I then helped them with sorting out some images for them.</p>
<p>Even though I&#8217;m a small agency this is something I would not have dreamt of doing a few years ago as &#8216;press lists&#8217; were know as your secret weapon. </p>
<p>So why would I help a big agency for no money (and  I wasn&#8217;t angling for a job.)  The reason is because my mind set has changed and I now regard other PR people, not as competitors but as part of my community. I know one day I can pull on their knowledge pool for help (well hopefully.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
